D.A., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
"D.A. (the Father) appeals from a dependency adjudication with respect to his minor child, R.A. We affirm the supplemental dependency adjudication order entered below."
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
"S.S. (the "Mother") appeals an order adjudicating her children C.M. and I.M. dependent and placing them in the custody of the Department of Children and Families ("Department"). Finding that the dependency adjudication is not supported by competent, substantial evidence, we reverse."
J.B., III father of J.B., a child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
"T.L. (the Father) appeals a final judgment that terminated his parental rights to his son, D.L.H. Because the Department of Children and Family Services (DCF) failed to establish (1) a nexus or predictive relationship between the past abuse of D.L.H.'s sibling and any prospective abuse of D.L.H. and (2) that termination was the least restrictive means to protect D.L.H. from harm, we reverse the final judgment of termination and remand for further proceedings."
T.P., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
"The father, T.P., appeals from a final judgment terminating his parental rights to his daughter, Z.K.P. We affirm.
T.P. is the father of a girl, Z.K.P, and twin babies, Z.K.G. and Z.K.G. (the "twins"). The twins, one of whom is a male and the other a female, were five weeks old and Z.K.P. was two and a half years old at the time they came into the custody of the Department of Children and Family Services ("DCF")."
M.F., the Father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
"M.F., the father, appeals the trial court's adjudication of dependency with respect to his three children, A.F., W.F., and Ma.F. The Department of Children and Families ("the department") initiated dependency proceedings when M.F.'s daughter, A.F., was born cocaine-positive and the mother tested positive for cocaine at A.F.'s birth. M.F. did not consent to the adjudication of dependency and this case proceeded to trial. The father argues on appeal that the evidence was insufficient to support the adjudication of dependency. We agree and reverse."