Where a criminal defendant files a motion to dismiss on the basis of §776.032, the trial court should decide the factual question of the applicability of the statutory immunity.
Source: Westlaw
A writ of prohibition is the proper vehicle for challenging a trial court's denial of a motion to dismiss a charge made on the ground of immunity from prosecution pursuant to the so-called "Stand Your Ground Law."
Source: Westlaw
Defendant who was found by the trial court to have used deadly force pursuant to Stand-Your-Ground law was immune from prosecution, where trial court held an evidentiary hearing, made determinations of credibility, weighed the numerous pieces of conflicting evidence, and set forth extensive factual findings in a nine-page-order.
Source: Westlaw
Murder defendant had clear legal right to a pre-trial evidentiary hearing and adjudication of his immunity claim under the Stand Your Ground Law, and, thus, was entitled to mandamus relief, as defendant filed motion asserting entitlement to immunity under Stand Your Ground Law seven weeks prior to trial, which was well in advance of scheduled trial date, such that to decline to conduct a pre-trial hearing and determine immunity issue prior to trial would operate to deprive defendant of at least some measure of the "true" immunity contemplated by the legislature.
Source: Westlaw