West's Florida Practice Series TM
DUI Handbook
§ 1:3. Proof of driving or actual physical control of a vehicle
"Typically, an officer or another witness sees the driving or the defendant's statements prove the driving.When that is not true, the circumstantial evidence rule applies. Thus, in Davis v. State, for example, the court acquitted the defendant where the evidence failed to overcome his testimony and other proof that he was only a passenger in the car. The result was the same in Lukas v. State, where there was no direct evidence of driving or actual physical control and the circumstantial evidence failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. The court came to a contrary conclusion in West v. State, a DUI Manslaughter case, based solely on the State's expert testimony." For more information, see the remainder of the article.