Skip to Main Content

DUI's in Florida by Stephanie Stich: Forms

Forms Used by Prosecutor

For a DUI case to be successfully prosecuted, an officer must create a probable cause affidavit which clearly establishes the level of impairment at the time of the offense through the officer's observations. Subsequent evidence of impairment, such chemical test results, including a breath, blood, or urine test will be admissible only when a proper arrest has been made. For the prosecutor to make their DUI case, they must establish that the defendant was driving or operating a vehicle, or in actual physical control of a vehicle within while  under the influence of alcohol or drugs. 

The prosecutor uses various forms to establish to a court of law that the following procedures were followed:

  1. There were reasonable grounds for arrest. The accused was the operator of the vehicle or in actual physical control of the vehicle. That there were lawful grounds for the officer to conduct a stop of the vehicle. There was probable cause to believe that the accused was impaired. The proper arrest procedures were followed. The accused was given his Miranda Rights. That subsequent observation and interview of the suspect provided additional evidence relevant to he alleged offense. There was a proper request for the suspect to submit to the chemical test.

Form Used by Defense - Motion to Inspect Breathalyzer

Complete Manual of Criminal Forms 3d
Database updated July 2015
F. Lee Bailey , Kenneth J. Fishman 
Part 3. Discovery
Chapter 17. Production of Results of Physical and Scientific Tests or Experiments
[Caption]
NOW COMES the Defendant, through counsel, and respectfully moves this Honorable Court to direct the prosecution to permit him or his expert to inspect and test the equipment used to administer a breathalyzer examination upon the Defendant on [date], at approximately [a.m./p.m.]. As reason therefore, the Defendant states that this information is reasonable and necessary to enable him to confront and cross-examine evidence against him.
See WestlawNext for the rest.

Defense Forms - Motion in Limine to Exclude Breathalyzer Results

 
American Jurisprudence Pleading and Practice Forms Annotated
Database updated April 2015
Criminal Procedure
IX. Evidence
D. Production of Evidence at Trial
§ 393. Affidavit—In support of motion in limine to exclude breathalyzer results for failure to follow observation protocols
[Caption, see § 3]
AFFIDAVIT
State of [name of state]    
     
County of [name of county]    
Defendant's attorney, [name of defendant's attorney], being first duly sworn, deposes and states as follows:

 

1. I represent the defendant in the above-captioned matter and have knowledge of the facts stated in this affidavit separate from any communications with my client.

 

2. On [date of pretrial conference], I obtained automatic discovery with respect to the above-captioned case, which included [description of discovery]. The police reports indicate that a breathalyzer was conducted [number of hours]hours after the defendant was arrested. The breathalyzer was thus not conducted within a “reasonable time” as required for the admission of a breath test, even if the government's allegations are accepted as true for purposes of this motion.

 

See WestlawNext for the rest.

Defense Forms - Motion to Suppress Urine Test

Drinking/Driving Trial Notebook
Database updated December 2013
Flem K. Whited III
Chapter 5. Pretrial Motions
§ 5:10. Motion to suppress urine test
State,  
   
  MOTION TO SUPPRESS
   
v. URINE TEST
   
Defendant.  
To:
Defendant, by and through his attorney moves this Court for an order to suppress the urine test taken by defendant for the following reasons:

 

1. The direct observation of the defendant, while urinating, violated defendant's constitutionally protected reasonable expectation of privacy. [Name of arresting officer]'s visual observation of defendant intruded on a privacy interest protected by the Fourth Amendment.
See Westlaw Next for the rest.

Defense Form - Motion to Suppress Field Sobriety Tests

Lane's Goldstein Litigation Forms
Database updated August 2014
Fred Lane
Part V. Motionså
Chapter 40. Motions to Suppress
III. Criminal Actions
 
§ 40:8. Motion to suppress—Field sobriety tests
[Caption]
Defendant, by and through h— attorney, moves this Court for an Order to suppress the field sobriety tests in this matter on the following grounds: 

 

() [State statute specifying sobriety test requirements] was not followed.

 

() The field sobriety tests are not scientifically reliable and the probative value of the field sobriety test results are so questionable that use of the test results at trial would unfairly prejudice the defendant pursuant to [state criminal procedure rule regarding the inadmissibility of prejudicial evidence].

 

See WestlawNext for the rest.

Search the Library to locate books, e-books, videos, articles, journals...
Search For

Other Search Options